Sometimes a larger subject could be evaluated from looking at a fragment of the subject to see how much one would have to diverge from reason to form such a perspective in the first place.

An example of this would be in debates about for-profit healthcare vs. private healthcare, where concerns about the effects of the profit motive are dismissed by merely asserting that the profit motive is the only way, even ridiculing those who suggest it does not have to be... and yet, here we are on the Internet, a medium known for its enormous amounts of material that people did not have to be paid to make. Regardless of the variety of motives involved in people working on it, one point is clear, that the profit motive is not always a crucial component.

As such, those who would insist on denying this within the Internet have shown an apparent tendency towards willful ignorance. Is it really in doubt, then, that willful ignorance would play a role in other aspects of their perspective?

EDIT: How do you switch this thing to HTML?

Sage edit: Click the HTML button Either that or simply work with the stuff above the post space.