Mobius Forum Archive

Martian Anomalies
 
Notifications
Clear all

Martian Anomalies

7 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
204 Views
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
New Member Guest
 

There are considerably large multitudes of officially released photos taken on Mars that contain anomalies in them. Whether the anomaly in question is an object of some sort or a mysterious phenomenon is often of little relevance: these photos capture the imaginations of many people and fuel intense speculation about life currently existing on the red planet, Mars.
I'll be posting photos of several distinct Martian anomalies in this post and anyone who might reply to this thread is welcome to scrutinise those photos and also post their own photos of Martian anomalies.
One site I particularly suggest people visit for celestial anomalies (ie. moon anomalies and planetary anomalies) in general is The Living Moon. ALL of the photos posted on that site are sourced from NASA. It's nothing short of an incredibly thought-provoking site (
http://www.thelivingmoon.com ). Anyway, now I'll begin analysing the first of 4 anomalies on Mars:

Martian Crater Housing A Dome?

Here is a photo taken of Mars' surface which has been zoomed into several times:

Notice the crater in the centre of the photo. Here is a close-up of that crater:

There appears to be an odd dome-like object situated in the middle of the crater. Here's yet another close-up view:

The dome-like object in the crater's centre appears to be three-dimensional, not a flat structure. To me, the surface of this so-called 'dome' seems to be similar to that of a golf ball. Upon close inspection of the dome-like object, I think I can say with some confidence that it's partially covered by Martian soil. Another point of interest to me is that the dome-like object in question is, for all intents and purposes, perfectly round in shape. So that's interesting. These images, showing an object akin to a dome, show reasonable signs of artificiality.

A Second Face?

Perhaps everyone here has heard about the infamous 'Face On Mars'. It has long been regarded by both sceptics and NASA itself as a mere optical illusion produced by the interplay of light and shadow. I find that line of reasoning fairly convincing and therefore I don't consider the 'Face On Mars' to be very evidential in regard to the existence of intelligent life on Mars. But there is another structure, be it natural or artificial, that resembles a human/humanoid face. However, due to the sheer hype over the 'Face On Mars' during the last two to three decades, this particular 'face' has gone by almost entirely unnoticed:

The 'face' photographed above (and intentionally colourised to show greater detail) is located in a valley of Libya Montes near the equator of Mars. Here's the exact same photo but zoomed into further:

This photo, in my honest opinion, is VASTLY more convincing than the overrated original 'Face On Mars'. It seems much more likely that this particular 'face' was designed intelligently, not just due to its symmetry, but also due to the comparitive ease with which certain facial features can be noticed (such as two eyes, two nostrils, a closed mouth and a chin, for example). Here is a photo of yet another face-like structure on Mars, with markings made in red on the right:

This 'face' bears a striking resemblance to Nefertiti of ancient Egypt, does it not?

Another Dome & A Statue?

Here's a photo from the site Mars Anomaly Research that contains various anomalies:

As you can see, various anomalies such as rivers, buildings and large girders are referred to in the photo above. Personally, I can't see ANYTHING of that sort. Perhaps they're looking too closely? In any case, what I can see (rather vaguely, albeit) in the photo above is a dome-like structure and what appears to be a COLOSSAL human-like statue. When I first saw this photo, I admittedly looked closer at where the 'statue' supposedly was with plenty of scepticism... yet then I noticed that there DID indeed appear to be a statue-like structure! There really did! It was the damnedest thing! Check out this even closer view:

And last, but certainly not least:

Artificial Tubes On Mars?

Several years ago, photos were taken on the surface of Mars by NASA/Malin Space Science Systems which showed strange tubular structures which appear to be hundreds of miles in length. These structures, on close inspection, almost definitely have a shiny surface (since it seems as though sunlight can be reflected off of it) and are made of a glass-like material. I find the so-called 'Martian Tubes' to be a FAR more fascinating planetary anomaly than the infamous 'Face On Mars'. I think that the Martian Tubes are very underrated. I still don't know for certain whether or not the 'Face On Mars' is a genuinely artificial structure, so I will reserve judgement on it (for now, anyway). But I do think that the Martian Tubes are GENUINELY ARTIFICIAL. There's something going on there, that's quite clear to me. I'll now post some officially released photographs of the Martian Tubes one by one, providing my comments on each photograph.

This is personally my favourite photo out of all the officially released photos of the Martian Tubes. In this photo, there seems to be three distinct tubular structures. The tube stretching out to the right has some bends in it and I personally think that the white dot shining on it is the Sun. However, for that tube to be able to cast a reflection, it would need to have a reflective surface. Hence, I think that these photographed tubes are composed of a glassy substance of some sort. Also, notice the white lines (or 'ribs', as I call them) on the tubes. To me, they seem as though they're metallic.

What particularly fascinates me about this photo is that the tube in question is only visible towards the centre of the photo. It seems to 'dip' itself underground in both the top and bottom of the photo. Is this a failed attempt to hide something? Or is it intentionally exposed slightly above Mars' surface for a reason most of us don't know?

This photo is similar to the photo above, with the exception being that there is clearly a larger chunk of the Martian surface that has been removed towards the bottom of the photo. This, I think, is to provide more space for the tube.

This particular photo is VERY thought-provoking, in my opinion. There is only ONE tube visible at the top of the photo, but if you look downwards, you'll notice that the singular tube eventually splits into two separate directions. Did someone or something want the choice of being able to move left or right?

The image below is by John Bejko from the site Meta Research. It is an artist's conception of the Martian Tubes:

If I remember correctly, these photographs of the Martian Tubes were released sometime back during 2000. So they were released relatively recently. However, a man by the name of Ernest L. Norman wrote a book entitled The Truth About Mars and described, through an alleged process of remote-viewing, a system of enormous interconnected tubes used for transportation purposes. The truly incredible thing about all of this is that The Truth About Mars was written and released in May 1955! Norman was reputed to have highly refined clairvoyant abilities. In 1955, whilst meditating, he apparently managed to mentally contact a humanoid Martian inhabitant by the name of 'Nur El'. After receiving Ernest's permission, Nur El took him on an astral flight to Mars. Here is some information about what Ernest Norman supposedly witnessed on Mars (thanks to this URL: http://www.unarius.org/enews/enews9.html ):

"Ernest Norman gives an eyewitness account of his "visit" to the red planet in "The Truth About Mars." He relates how and why the Martians, an advanced race of humankind, live in underground cities. Through their advanced scientific understanding and superior telescopes, the Martians were forewarned about a cataclysmic cosmic event that would make the surface of their planet uninhabitable. They had enough preparatory time to move their civilization underground, after a fruitless search for another nearby habitable planet.

Built on the floor of huge metallic domes up to five miles in diameter and three thousand feet in height, the Martian cities are interconnected by enormous tubes, three to five hundred feet in diameter, which carry a rapid transit monorail system that is environmentally protected within the tubes. Interestingly, the aforementioned MGS photos showing "strange tubular" or "glassy tunnels" validate Mr. Norman's description of the underground tunnels, which are partially buried beneath the Martian surface and exposed with the shifting desert sands.

The Martians are very spiritually advanced as well as technically superior to the Earth people. Their society is one of peace and harmony, as they maintain a balance between the material and the spiritual elements of life. There is a very simple form of government and no need for written laws because each individual demonstrates a very high level of personal integrity, practicing the golden rule of treating others as they would like to be treated. The Martian people are similar to the Chinese or the Mongolians in appearance, but they are smaller in stature, with the average height being four feet, six inches.

If you are wondering whether the Martians will one day visit us here on Earth, well, for now that would pose some difficult challenges. For one thing, they have long ago conquered diseases so physical contact with Earth people would prove very deadly for them, as they have lost their resistance to germs and viruses. However, there are plans in the near future for the people of Earth to view their wonderful underground civilization via our television technology!

Planet Earth is beginning to awaken to the fact that we are not alone in the universe. The waking-up process has been comparatively slow, but we are entering a new age, a new beginning where we will come to know our interplanetary neighbors as expressions of the Infinite Creative Universe."

As you can tell from the statements above, Norman described tubular structures on Mars DECADES before such structures were actually photographed by NASA. What so many people thought was 'crazy' back then about Norman's claims is no longer considered to be that 'crazy' anymore by most of those SAME people. Norman has been VINDICATED! As for the alleged underground inhabitants of Mars being 'humanoids', I don't think it's very mind-blowing that beings who look anatomically similar to us could exist on Mars. Why not? Because Mars, through scientific studies, has been shown to have once been EXTREMELY similar to Earth in terms of its geology and atmosphere (the only major difference is that Mars is smaller in size than Earth). If this is the case, why is it so surprising that creatures anatomically similar to us could have evolved on Mars millions (if not BILLIONS) of years ago through convergent evolution? Furthermore, why is the notion of life flourishing underground still met with so much scepticism even today in these supposedly more 'scientifically enlightened' times? Is it not a blatant assumption made by astrobiologists that if signs of life are not found on the SURFACE of a planet, then that planet is ENTIRELY DEVOID of life altogether? I understand that in the broad field of science, assumptions MUST be made for hypotheses to be formed. But scientific assumptions should AT LEAST be educated! Who says that life can ONLY exist on and/or above the surface of a planet? For all we know, the VAST MAJORITY of planets in our universe could indeed be inhabited by lifeforms (perhaps even lifeforms similar to us in intelligence and sapience!), but these planets might ONLY be inhabited under their surfaces. Our planet supposedly containing life only on its outer surface (or perhaps BOTH on its inner surface AND its outer surface) could actually be a rare freak event of Nature throughout this universe. If we wish to find traces of life on other planets and moons anytime soon, we should broaden our criteria of what 'life' is and where it can be found. In the meantime, I remain utterly intrigued by these tubular structures on Mars which, as far as I'm concerned, are CLEARLY artificial. So, any contributions?

 
(@cyberknux_1722585730)
Posts: 286
Reputable Member
 

I enjoy being able to read your empassionate posts on various mysteries of the universe, Rishi. I certainly learn things. Thankyou very much for the photos, I hadn't seen a single one of these pictures before, and they're pretty amazing - it's astonishing that the inferior 'face' gets mention all the time when there's this comparitive masterpiece.

I have "I WANT TO BELIEVE" stamped on my forehead - anyone who gets me talking about the paranormal and the likes sees that immediately - but without knowing enough about geography and what causes various terrain patterns (and not knowing what winds and water flow could have been like on Mars) I have to put aside my desire for the faces and tubes to be artificially created. I want to do some research on these tubes and see if any scientists have put forward theories on how they could have been formed. As for the perfect appearance of the face - I'd love to see it in three dimensions. The more famous face falls apart when viewed that way (unless its alien artists knew that it would always be viewed from that particular angle by... whoever was looking at it from off-world), though looking at this better face it seems like the eyes are the only things that are formed solely of shadow. Why just the face rather than a full head outline though? And at least clear away that 'crown' and the octopus leeched onto its face. But perhaps it's been buried and we can't see everything. That'll be it! Underneath the dust and rock (its creators can't return to the surface and clear it away) it's as finely crafted as Michelangelo's David. A giant David carved by turbolasers stationed on Deimos! ...I love allowing myself to indulge.

OT: Origin of the character in your avatar? Your previous avatar looked to be from Sister Princess, but I don't recognise this one. Very cute.

 
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
New Member Guest
 

Thanks for your feedback of kind words, healthy scepticism and enthusiasm, Cyber. I sincerely appreciate it. As for your off-topic question, my previous avatar was indeed from Sister Princess whilst my current avatar is from Quilt.

 
(@quantom-x)
Posts: 160
Estimable Member
 

Whoa! That's cool!

 
(@hypersonic2003)
Posts: 5035
Illustrious Member
 

Hhahah Rishi...nice. You always have nice topics discussing the cosmos and whatnot. That dome pic, is rather interesting, i'll admit. And the face that resembles Nefertiti...wow. That's awesome! 😛 And those tubes...umm what?! *runs and hides* Nice topic man.

 
(@Anonymous)
Posts: 0
New Member Guest
 

 
(@hypersonic2003)
Posts: 5035
Illustrious Member
 

HAHAHAHA! Priceless!

 
Share: