You make a pretty poor impression of a girl

I don't wish to be associated with the likes of that woman. Anyway, to answer her question: chrysanthemums are my favourite type of flower.

...

Rishi, fail harder, please.

Perhaps a day too late, good sir.

Why must you put us through this torture?

Hmm, an impression so absurd it can't even be called a stereotype?

I can do that too!

*Rishi*Have any of you ever considered the obvious fact that computers are powered by fairies?

I looked in there and there are lights that GLOW!

Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, a credible source because he has sir in front of his name and wrote books, believed in them and so should you:

The recognition of their existence will jolt the material twentieth-century out of its heavy ruts in the mud, and will make it admit that there is a glamour and a mystery to life

Think it's shopped? HA! PHOTOSHOP DID NOT EXIST THEN! It had been lost for milennia since it was invented 7 cycles of civilization ago and would not be rediscovered until some aliens brought the secret they learned from the Mayans to Adobe to support their galactic war.

Doyle explains:

To the objections of photographers that the fairy figures show quite different shadows to those of the human our answer is that ectoplasm, as the etheric protoplasm has been named, has a faint luminosity of its own, which would largely modify shadows

Doyle quotes C. W. Leadbeater, ya hear that, MORE evidence from hundreds of years ago:

elemental fairies (being one type of fairy) "are the thought-forms of the Great Beings, our angels, who are in charge of the evolution of the vegetable kingdom. When one of these Great Ones has a new idea connected with one of the kinds of plants or flowers which are under his charge, he often creates a thought-form for the special purpose of carrying out that idea. It usually takes the form either of an etheric model of the flower itself or of a little creature which hangs round the plant or the flower all through the time that the buds are forming, and gradually builds them into the shape and colour of which the angel has thought. But as soon as the plant has fully grown, or the flower has opened, its work is over and its power is exhausted, and, as I have said, it just simply dissolves, because the will to do that piece of work was the only soul that it had" (p187/.

In fact, fairies were present at most events of history, and that is how Nostradamus was able to predict them, by communicating with fairies.

Can you prove that fairies don't operate computers? Obviously not!*/Rishi*

Disclaimer: despite the mocking, I hold Rishi's theories in higher regard than a number of common belief systems throughout the world, especially conservatism. That these sound any less credible is purely a product of their lack of a movement of people advocating them. I hesitate to be so rude, but the OP was just offensive.

Also the first post would be a totally legitimate discussion if not for the way it was presented.

Vec, that was the best post I have ever seen in a Rishi topic. I love you.

In fact, fairies were present at most events of history, and that is how Nostradamus was able to predict them, by communicating with fairies.

I've always felt that Edgar Cayce was more accurate than Nostradamus. Nostradamus is overrated, IMO. Anyway, back on topic: I not only like chrysanthemums, I also think sunflowers are pretty cool too.

In fact, fairies were present at most events of history, and that is how Nostradamus was able to predict them, by communicating with fairies.

I've always felt that Edgar Cayce was more accurate than Nostradamus. Nostradamus is overrated, IMO. Anyway, back on topic: I not only like
chrysanthemums, I also think sunflowers are pretty cool too.

I gotta say, I respect that response to such snark. I was going to delete the Rishi impression for being rude.

I was going to delete the Rishi impression for being rude.

S'ok. I actually found it kinda lulzy.