www.spiegel.de/internatio...71,00.html
Quote:
The word has only been in the English language for two decades, but the hamburger chain McDonald's would like to see the word "McJob" McEliminated from the dictionary -- the fast food firm is not lovin' the OED's definition.
It's a bit of job-seeking advice that parents have been dishing out to their aimless, unskilled, post-high school offspring for decades: You can always work at McDonald's.
And many have taken that advice. It is estimated that fully one out of every eight workers in the United States has put in stints behind the counters of the fast-food McGiant. Most of them have been eager to leave as quickly as possible. Low pay, poor prestige, and less-than-haute cuisine combine to make the job of a burger flipper McSpurned.
But at least the job shouldn't be denigrated in the English language as well. McDonald's Corp. on Tuesday restarted its push to get the word "McJob" removed from dictionaries -- and has set its sights on the gold standard of lexicons, the Oxford English Dictionary.
From the point of view of the fast-food proletariat, the reason for the McLanguage offensive is clear: The word McJob, as the OED definition makes clear, is "depreciative." It goes on to define the term as: "An unstimulating, low-paid job with few prospects, esp. one created by the expansion of the service sector." It found its way into the dictionary in March 2001, 15 years after it was apparently coined by the Washington Post.
"Dictionaries are supposed to be paragons of accuracy. And it this case, they got it completely wrong," Walt Riker, a Mickey D's McSpokesman complained to the Associated Press. "It's a complete disservice and incredibly demeaning to a terrific work force and a company that's been a jobs and opportunity machine for 50 years."
The company says it will kick off its campaign in May in an attempt to change the "out-of-date" definition, as McDonald's spokeswoman Amanda Pierce called the McJob entry. But the hamburger giant may have to break out some special sauce for the effort. In 2003, the Merriam-Webster dictionary -- which defines McJob as "a low-paying job that required little skill and provides little opportunity of advancement" -- elected not to remove the word, despite McPressure.
The OED, for its part, has released a statement indicating it will likely also retain the word. "We can confirm that we monitor changes in the language and reflect these in our definitions, according to the evidence we find," the statement sent to SPIEGEL ONLINE reads.
There are other indications that Greasy McD's may be fighting a losing McBattle. The OED also has an entry for the entire "Mc" prefix, defining it as a depreciative prefix attached "chiefly to nouns to form nouns with the sense 'something that is of mass appeal, a standardized or bland variety... .'" McMansion -- "a modern house built on a large and imposing scale, but regarded as ostentatious and lacking in architectural integrity" -- is also in the dictionary.
The burger joint itself has coined a couple of OED entries. "Quarter pounder" makes an appearance. So too, does the (transitive) verb "to supersize," defined as "To increase the size of, esp. to extravagant proportions."
Changing any of these entries will be quite a McJob.
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAND in the follow up....
news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6683365.stm
Quote:
Fast-food giant McDonald's has launched a petition to get the dictionary definition of a McJob changed.
The Oxford English Dictionary currently describes a McJob as "an unstimulating low-paid job with few prospects".
McDonald's says this definition is now "out of date and insulting", and claims a survey found that 69% of the UK population agree it needs updating.
The campaign by the firm's UK arm is backed by the government's skills envoy and former CBI boss Sir Digby Jones.
'Making a stand'
"The current definition is extremely insulting to the 67,000 people who work for us within the UK," said McDonald's senior vice president David Fairhurst.
"It is also insulting for everyone else who works in the wider restaurant and tourism sectors.
"It is time for us now to make a stand and get the Oxford English Dictionary to change the definition."
McDonald's says that in its staff surveys, 90% of employees agree they are given valuable training that will be of benefit for the rest of their working lives.
And 82% of its workers would recommend working at the company to their friends.
'Derogatory'
McDonald's is now inviting its customers to sign petition books in its stores, or alternatively via a new website, entitled Change The Definition.Meanwhile, Labour MP Clive Betts is sponsoring an Early Day Motion in the Commons, which regrets the use of the derogatory phrases attached to service sector jobs.
McDonalds says it will hand the petition into the Oxford English Dictionary in the autumn.
Its campaign is further supported by British Chambers of Commerce director general David Frost, British Retail Consortium director general Kevin Hawkins and City & Guilds director general Chris Humphries.The word McJob was first used in the US in the 1980s and was popularised by Douglas Coupland's 1991 book Generation X.
It first appeared in the online version of the Oxford English Dictionary in March 2001.
Last year McDonald's tried to improve the image of its employment opportunities with the slogan: "McProspects - over half of our executive team started in our restaurants. Not bad for a McJob."
Michelin Man Junior was not available for comment.
Oh, c'mon now. You don't agree? That is a pretty friggin' shady of a term, and obviously pointed right at them. See, I guess my senior year English teacher taught me something: it's not just flipping burgers, because our people before us called it opportunity. You've got to start somewhere.
Granted, yes, it's NOT the best place to start. But when you have nowhere to go due to whatever the reason, and want to start earning some monies, you go wherever you possibly get accepted to.
HAHA @ photo <333
I had no idea "McJob" was even a word, so I can't say I care much. However, I do think the amount of concern being placed on the word is entirely stupid and effective to no ends.
If people even use the word "McJob" (I have never heard it once) they are going to use it like they hear it. They are not going to consult the dictionary.
McJob is a word?
What the smeg?
I mean I've heard of a Mc"Jobbie" =P
Ahahahahahahahahahahaharepeatadinfinitum.
This whole campaign is complete bollocks. Dictionaries, the OED in particular, follow usage, not the other way round. As I understand the Oxford English Dictionary makes a big thing of defining words as closely as possible to how they are actually used. I must admit it's not a term I hear often, but it's used in a derogative fashion and thus that's how it's defined. What's next, the NAACP rising up and demanding the definition of the n-word be changed because it's insulting to black people?
Besides, even if Mickey Ds could get the OED to change the definition, no-one - I say no-one - would start using it in whatever sycophantic sense McDonald's might have it redefined. Most people pick up words from how other people use them, not from poring over the dictionary in search of extravagant new vocabulary.
In summary, this campaign is ass-backwards in both intent and execution.
Wow.
"McJob"?
What's the world coming to?
Fussing over a dictionary entry?